An open, Beckn-aligned network for legal services
An open, Beckn-aligned protocol to discover, engage, track, and hold accountable any legal service provider — from an NRI in San Jose to a farmer in Tamil Nadu. No data silos. No gatekeepers. No corruption, by design.
Scroll — follow one message through the city of courts
One signed intent leaves a home in San Jose. The gateway broadcasts it to every matching provider on the network — family-law advocates, Chennai, NRI-capable. Quotes come back with fees, SLAs, and verified credentials.
Scope, fee quote, and response-time SLAs are locked in a signed engagement at the advocate's chambers — including a digital vakalatnama. Its hash lands on the ledger before any work begins.
The advocate reports progress — and the court adapter syncs eCourts independently from the district court itself. Your case status no longer depends on your lawyer's availability.
A missed SLA escalates automatically. Only confirmed engagements can be rated. Every event is carved into the transparency ledger — metadata, never content — so accountability outlives the matter.
Choose your path
Litigation work should feel operational. A pre-marriage clarity conversation should feel calm, private, and human. OLP supports both without forcing every user into the same workspace UI.
For legal teams, lawyers, and matter operators
For couples before marriage
cases pending across Indian courts
NJDG, 2025judges per million people — the US has 100
Parliament records, 2025to enforce a contract. Singapore: 164 days
World BankNRIs with no real-time visibility into their cases
MEA estimatesCorruption thrives on one thing: information asymmetry. A lawyer who can go silent. A court status nobody can verify. A fee nobody quoted. An open protocol eliminates each asymmetry — structurally.
At 5 a.m. in California, a 67-year-old father refreshes the eCourts portal again. An FIR he never saw coming. Marked “absconding” despite cooperating through counsel. A Look Out Circular that exiled him from his own country. Bail adjourned four times. A lawyer silent for weeks.
Eleven months of darkness ended in a heart attack. The system never told him anything — every fact that could have protected him existed, in someone's silo.
Every action timestamped. Every hearing tracked independently. Every silence escalated automatically. No one should face the system in the dark.
The film · Fall forward
Nothing worthwhile comes without risk.
Fifty-two million, waiting for a break.
Told to wait. Told to have something to fall back on.
Carrying everything we have.
Everything we love, on thin ice.
You will be tested.
These are the ghosts of fights never fought.
If you are going to fall —
Fall forward.
To get something you never had, do something you never did.
Give everything you’ve got.
And never let go.
CourtXAI
In your element.
Cross-border by construction
Explore reference journeys for a network where every handoff is signed, every provider is discoverable, and every receipt can be verified.
Drag to rotate · Arrow keys to inspect
Consumer to court
A signed request starts in California, reaches a verified provider in Chennai, and receives an independently sourced court update through the network.
discover → engage → track → receiptThe participants
The app a litigant actually uses — an NRI portal, a corporate compliance dashboard, a legal-aid front end. It speaks the protocol; it owns nothing it didn't create.
Where services live: an advocate's practice tools, an ODR provider, an AI drafting service. Discoverable by any consumer app, locked into none.
Bridges official court systems — eCourts, NJDG, High Court portals — onto the network, so case status flows independently of any single lawyer.
Hague Convention service, foreign-judgment recognition, NRI workflows — jurisdiction-spanning legal plumbing as a network primitive.
Routes signed messages between participants, broadcasts discovery, and enforces network policy: data residency, consent, verification.
Verified identities with public keys, and an append-only log of transaction metadata — never content — that makes patterns of delay and silence visible.
Who it serves
Your reputation, portable. Your clients, yours.
Court data that reaches litigants without burning out portals.
Stop rebuilding the plumbing. Ship the service.
Visibility you don't have to beg for.
The trust layer
Indian PII is processed on Indian soil. Cross-border transfer only with explicit consent — DPDP Act, 2023, enforced as network policy, not a promise.
Advocate enrollment is checked against Bar Council records at registration and refreshed periodically. Fake credentials don't survive the registry.
Ed25519 signatures on every protocol message. The gateway verifies before it routes. Tampering is detectable by construction.
Transaction metadata lands on an append-only ledger — hashes, timestamps, milestones. Never case content. Silence and delay become measurable.
SLAs are part of the engagement. A lawyer who goes silent past the window triggers escalation without the client having to fight for it.
A multi-stakeholder foundation — judiciary, BCI, DoJ, NALSA, builders, litigants — where no single entity holds more than 25% voting power.
Structural countermeasures
The protocol doesn't promise integrity. It designs for it — one asymmetry at a time.
A proven pattern
The same open-network pattern that moved payments, commerce, and education — proposed for the one system every other system depends on: the law. PULSE, Beckn's dispute-resolution protocol, explicitly scopes out lawyer discovery and legal services. OLP extends it to cover the full lifecycle.
Plain answers
Founding network
Advocates, courts, legal-aid bodies, and builders shaping the protocol before it ships. Early participants help define the spec — and are first on the registry when it goes live.